Suzuki Motorcycles Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,289 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Out of the crate....
Rolled it on a Dynojet 250i with .3 miles on the OD
Rolled off with 7 miles.
158.7 peak w/MR9
no "sniffer"


Seems very low to me..., but maybe after more miles are put on it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,289 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
silversv1k said:
dyno numbers are just that numbers, they dont mean much with nothing to compare it to
Yeah, yeah.....we know...it's about TQ curve, dips, blah blah....all that mess. Eitherway, 158 is a low number for that bike.
 

·
Members
Joined
·
5,173 Posts
do you have any other dyno's from that exact dyno? ie your bike, etc? a stock k7, etc? I mean if the dyno reads low then big deal,but if say your bike did 173 on it then that means a lot.
 

·
meh..buh
Joined
·
845 Posts
makes a lot more sense given the crank horsepower they claim.

It should give pretty much the same stock numbers as the gixxer. The crank numbers from the factory are the same for both bikes.
 

·
And, Here, We, Go...
Joined
·
8,017 Posts
meenbeemer said:
dont care that thing is so damn
they should really fire the guy who designde that thing its worse than when ducati came out with the 999
I like that they redesigned it, but the front is funny looking, light years better looking then the 999 imho, hehe, but still funny looking. I prefer the CBR1K, but many don't like its snout..:biggrin
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top